Review by Brian Durant
In the years following the
initial run of The Twilight Zone,
there were numerous attempts to bring Rod Serling’s celebrated anthology series
to the big screen. Serling himself attempted to get a feature-length project
off the ground several times but was never successful. In 1982, Steven
Spielberg, fresh off the massive success of Raiders
of the Lost Ark (1981) and E.T. (1982), announced that he had secured the rights for a feature-length film
adaptation of the series. Of all the names that had been associated with a
possible Twilight Zone film or
revival series over the years, Spielberg’s seemed the most appropriate. He
appeared to have a great admiration for fantasy and science fiction and his
first big break into the industry came in 1969 when he directed the “Eyes”
segment of Serling’s Night Gallery pilot
film. He also directed Serling’s “Make Me Laugh” for the first season of the show
the following year. In 1971, he achieved another high point in his early career
when he directed a feature-length version of Richard Matheson’s story Duel for NBC. The television special,
which starred Twilight Zone alumni
Dennis Weaver, was enormously successful and when asked about the film in
interviews Matheson always said it was among his favorite film adaptations.
Given his unprecedented popularity and the confidence of key figures from the
original series like Serling and Matheson, Spielberg seemed the obvious choice
to helm such a project.
He enlisted friend and
filmmaker John Landis to co-produce the film with him. The film would be split
into four half-hour segments. One of the segments would be an original story and
the other three would be adaptations of episodes from the original series. Landis
volunteered to write and direct the original segment and also an opening prologue.
Spielberg chose George Clayton Johnson’s “Kick the Can” for his segment. “It’s
a Good Life,” adapted for the show by Serling from a story by Jerome Bixby, was
given to director Joe Dante. And George Miller was given the task of directing
Richard Matheson’s classic psychological thriller “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet.” Matheson
was the natural choice to pen the remainder of the screenplay, sharing screen
credit for “Kick the Can” with friend and original writer George Clayton
Johnson and E.T. screenwriter Melissa
Mathison (under the pseudonym “Josh Rogan”). The score would be arranged by
veteran composer Jerry Goldsmith, whose music for the original series had been
an enormous influence on the show. The film would also feature a handful of
actors from the original series with the great Burgess Meredith stepping in as
narrator, an obvious choice. With what felt like all of the right people for
the job, Twilight Zone: The Movie was
sure to be a commercial and creative success.
The resulting film is
considered one of the most regretful chapters in the history of Hollywood. The
accidental deaths of actor Vic Morrow and child actors Myca Dinh Le (age 7) and
Renee Shin-Yi Chen (age 6) during the shooting of Landis’s segment cast an
ominous shadow over the entire production and caused Warner Brothers to
severely limit promotion of the film. The film performed poorly at the box
office and was generally not a success among critics. The special effects were
too extravagant, as was the majority of Goldsmith’s score, and the sets were
ridiculously over-the-top in every way, not at all like the modest sets of the
original episodes. Many fans also did not care for the drastic changes to “Kick
the Can” and “It’s a Good Life.” The silver lining of the film was a handful of
great performances especially from Vic Morrow and John Lithgow. While there
were good things to be said of the film, it was clear that the filmmakers
didn’t understand Serling’s vision for the original series.
A lesser known but more
enjoyable version of the film came in July of 1983 in the form of Robert Bloch’s
novelization of the movie published by Warner Books. Unlike many film
novelizations, which are often assigned to unknown or unsuccessful writers for
much less than it would cost to hire an established name, Bloch was a prolific
and highly-regarded writer of speculative fiction and a Hugo and Edgar Allan
Poe Award winner as well as the recipient of a Lifetime Achievement Award from
the World Fantasy Convention. Among his many books are the novels Night World (1972), American Gothic (1974), and The Night of the Ripper (1984). His novel Psycho
(1959) was the basis for the Hitchcock film and he wrote numerous episodes
of Alfred Hitchcock Presents, Thriller, Star Trek, and Night Gallery.
Bloch was a close friend of Matheson and of George Clayton Johnson.
The novelization is only available as a mass market paperback and would have cost American fans $2.95
when it was first released in 1983. It's not actually a novel-as the title page says it is-but a collection of four distinctly individual stories which have no overlapping characters or settings. It’s
roughly 200 pages with each segment clocking in around 50 pages. It features a
middle insert containing black and white photographs from the film. Other than
that the book is relatively bare bones. There is no introduction or afterword
and also no celebrity quotes anywhere on the book with the exception Serling’s
opening narration from the second season of the show on the back cover. The
book was also released in several international markets.
When first opening the book several changes are immediately noticeable. First, none of the stories contain opening or closing narrations, a trademark of the original series which is also featured in the movie and in both revival series. The stories are also given titles, where as in the film they are referred to only as “segments.” Each story bears the name of its main character. Readers will also notice that the order of the stories is different than it is in the films. The second and fourth segments are switched making the order:
Dutch edition, cover by Julie Bergen |
French edition, cover artist unknown, taken from the French film poster |
Italian edition, cover artist unknown |
When first opening the book several changes are immediately noticeable. First, none of the stories contain opening or closing narrations, a trademark of the original series which is also featured in the movie and in both revival series. The stories are also given titles, where as in the film they are referred to only as “segments.” Each story bears the name of its main character. Readers will also notice that the order of the stories is different than it is in the films. The second and fourth segments are switched making the order:
1.) “BILL” (Segment I)
2.) “VALENTINE” (Segment IV)
3.) “HELEN” (Segment III)
4.) “BLOOM” (Segment II)
According to Bloch he was given
an early draft of the screenplay and this was the order in which the segments
appeared. This order actually shifts the tone of the book with each story
slightly more hopeful than the one before it ending the book on a soft note
with Bloch’s version of “Kick the Can.” He also said that the version he was
given did not contain either the opening prologue—the driving sequence with Dan
Aykroyd and Albert Brooks—or the ending gag with Aykroyd in the ambulance.
1.) BILL
As a result of the tragic
accident that occurred while filming the opening segment, Landis was forced to
rewrite his screenplay. Originally written, Vic Morrow’s character redeems
himself by saving the lives of two Vietnamese children from an air strike.
Since they did not have all of the footage they needed Landis re-wrote the
story the way it appears in the film. Bloch was also asked to re-write part of
the first story to reflect how it appears onscreen. “Bill” is pretty faithful
to Landis’s screenplay with some minor scenes added to flesh out the story. For
instance, the story opens with Bill Conner driving to the bar, agitated and
swearing, swinging in and out of five o’clock traffic. We learn a bit more
about his character as well, like, for instance, that he is a salesman—no
surprise—and that he has a wife—slightly more surprising. The chase montage is
also a little longer with Conner briefly returning to the other time periods
after the Vietnam sequence before ending up in Nazi Germany as he does in the
film. Other than that the story is much the same as its big screen counterpart.
2.) VALENTINE
Out of all of the stories
this one is probably the most faithful to the screen version. Bloch’s version
is almost identical to Matheson’s in terms of action, although he includes a
lot of Valentine’s internal monologue at the beginning of the story, something
hard to explore on the screen. As I mentioned, there is no ambulance scene. The
story ends with the crew noticing the mangled engine. Bloch’s version is highly
enjoyable. Valentine comes across as an outlandish but believable and
sympathetic character. For fans of any of the previous versions of Matheson’s 1962
story I would recommend giving this one a read. This is probably the best story
in the book.
3.) HELEN
This is probably the worst
story in the book. Not terrible but definitely the weak spot of the
novelization although this is not so much Bloch’s fault as it is Matheson and Dante's. Bloch
opens with a scene not featured in the film. Helen Foley is attending her
mother’s funeral in Homewood, her home town. She has a sister, Vivian, whom she
is wildly resentful of because Vivian is ignorant and weak, but also because
she is pretty, a trait that has gotten her through most of her life. Helen, a
teacher, is disgruntled with her job and no longer feels connected to her home town.
The scene is several pages long and ends with her talking to her sister while
she waits for her mother’s funeral to end so she can skip town.
The next scene features Helen
on her way to her new life in Willoughby, punk rock blasting from her car
radio. Her internal dialogue races wildly here as she reflects on how
despondent kids have become and their obsessions with loud music and video
games. This is kind of an early reference to punk rock and to video games, both
of which were still relatively clandestine forms of entertainment in 1983. The
scene is written well and adds a depth to Helen’s character although the social
commentary feels more like Bloch’s than Helen’s.
The rest of the story follows
Matheson’s script pretty faithfully. The extra material is interesting and
gives Helen, who comes off a bit dull onscreen, a complex personality. Its
purpose is likely to explain the ludicrous ending in which Helen promises to teach Anthony how to stop being an omnipotent psychopath and in return he makes pretty
flowers bloom for her on the side of the road. Helen no longer feels joy as a
teacher. She doesn’t feel as if she is impacting the lives of her students the
way she had hoped. She sees Anthony as a broken child who feels unloved and
disconnected from everyone, someone just as lost as she is. In agreeing to be
his mentor she hopes to also fix herself in the process. The screenplay has
never been commercially released, although there are bits and pieces of it
floating around the internet. It would be interesting to see if this material
was included in Matheson’s screenplay or if it is Bloch’s invention.
On a side note, at one point
Serling intended to adapt Bixby’s story into a feature-length film and even completed a full-length screenplay for it before the project stalled.
4.) BLOOM
This is probably the story
which varies the most from the film version. George Clayton Johnson felt that
his original teleplay was a bit irresponsible in that it failed to portray the
reality of the situation. Who was going to take care of these children now?
Where would they live? Who would feed them? After being asked if he would be
interested in selling the screen rights to Warner Brothers for a film adaptation
of his Twilight Zone episode “Kick the Can,” Johnson submitted a
short, three-page outline to Frank Marshall and Kathleen Kennedy of Amblin
Entertainment. The outline contained an additional sequence which began where
the original story ended, with the kids running off into the woods. It follows
the kids on their adventure through the woods, running and laughing and soaking
in the joy of youth. As the excitement fades they become hungry and tired and
frightened. They begin to realize the consequences of their actions. They
stumble upon the rest home, unfamiliar to them now, and climb into the warm
beds where they are transformed back into their older selves. Matheson kept
Johnson’s idea but condensed it for time, eliminating the scenes of the
children in the woods. Unbeknownst to Matheson, after he submitted his final
draft Spielberg gave it to screenwriter Melissa Mathison for revision.
Spielberg had just worked with Mathison on E.T.
and felt that she could give the story a softer, whimsical quality. She
didn’t change the plot structure much but she did place heavy emphases on Mr.
Bloom’s supernatural abilities. In Bloch’s version—and presumably Matheson and
Johnson’s—the magic is still a bit ambiguous although it is assumed that Bloom
does have something to do with it. She also rewrote the scene with the children,
saturating it with syrupy-sweet dialogue and cheap visual gimmicks. This, in
combination with Jerry Goldsmith’s overly-sentimental music, Scatman Crother’s
very awkward performance, the archetypal supporting characters, and Spielberg’s
unusually whimsical direction, makes this the worst segment of the film.
Matheson and Johnson were both unhappy with it.
Bloch’s version also features
a dream montage which occurs just before Bloom wakes everyone to go play
outside. In it, Bloch goes inside the minds of nearly every character to give
the reader a glimpse into their dreams. Mrs. Dempsey dreams of her late husband.
Mr. Agee imagines himself as Douglas Fairbanks, fighting crime in Sherwood
Forrest. Mr. Mute dreams of mole rats. Mr. Weinstein wonders whether Mr. Bloom
is crazy or not but figures it doesn’t matter either way. The sequence is a
nice touch and helps to segue into the “magic” scene which follows.
Bloch took an almost
unwatchable segment of the film and turned it into a highly enjoyable story. His
version feels fresh and full of energy. He keeps the pace lively with his
signature brand of tongue-in-cheek humor but manages to hold on to the warm
nostalgia of Johnson’s original story. It comes recommended.
It’s not a book that is going
to change lives. It has flaws and its share of negative reviews. But after
having it on my shelf for several years I finally decided to give it a read and
was pleasantly surprised at how much I liked it. So if you are a fan of either
the show or the movie I would definitely recommend picking up a copy. It still
sells for relatively cheap on Amazon and eBay and finding a copy at a used bookstore
or library sale is still fairly common. If you don’t like it
you will not have wasted much money and you will own a cool piece of pop
culture that any diehard Twilight Zone fan
would appreciate.
If you’ve read Bloch’s
novelization feel free to comment and let us know what you thought!
Grateful acknowledgement is made to the following:
Internet Speculative Fiction
Database.
Archive of American
Television:
I saw the movie when it came out and was very disappointed. I have never gotten over the accident and John Landis's part in it. I had the book at the time but it's been so long since I read it. Thanks for the interesting summary! By the way, video games were not clandestine in 1983--they were everywhere. I was in college in Blomington, Indiana, in spring 1982 and I played Asteroids and Galaga all the time at the student union.
ReplyDeleteYou're right, Jack. Clandestine is probably not the right word. I guess I meant that it was still a relatively new form of entertainment. For some reason it seemed odd to me to be referenced in a book from that era by a writer who was in his sixties at the time. As for the movie, it's sort of a mixed bag. There are some good things to say about it but overall it is really disappointing. The accident makes that first segment, probably my favorite of the four, hard to watch. This novelization isn't going to change anyone's mind about the film but if you were disappointed with it then Bloch's book is a worthy alternative.
ReplyDeleteAn interesting aspect of Bloch's later work in general (70s and 80s) is that he often cast the younger generation in villainous roles, taking time to explore aspects of youth culture, often in a derisive manner. See his shorts "The Animal Fair" and "The Yugoslavs" for examples of this trend.
ReplyDeleteI have a ton of problems with the "It's a Good Life" segment but mostly I feel like the repeated motifs of video games and cartoons is tiresome and destracting, despite whatever verisimilitude it lends to the segment. The original was completely about suggestion, whereas the remake leaves nothing to the imagination of the audience.